|
Lesson 9
Lucy Terry Prince - Singer of History
A biography of David R. Proper
A publication of the Pocumtuck Valley Memorial
Association & Historic Deerfield, Inc.
Deerfield, Massachusetts
The Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association
and Historic Deerfield, Inc. publish
Lucy Terry Prince:Singer of History in observance of twenty-five
years of the joint operation of their libraries as The Memorial
Libraries and in recognition of David R. Proper's twenty-five years
of service, 1970-1995, as first Librarian.
LUCY TERRY PRINCE SINGER OF HISTORY*
Much in the achievements of Jupiter Hammon of
Long Island and Lucy Terry Prince of Massachusetts and Vermont offers
food for comparison. The pioneer black poet and poetess share race
and literary priority as well as social status as chattel property
in 18th-century America. Hammon has already received a measure of
recognition as the first published African-American poet, with his
broadside An Evening Thought: Salvation by Christ With Penetential
Cries, in 1761. Hammon's fame, nevertheless, rests on but seven
poems and four prose pieces discovered eightyseven years ago1
Lucy Terry Prince, on the other hand, is credited
with but a single poem, composed fourteen years before Hammon, although
not until recently recognized as the first poetry by any black American.
Both Hammon and Prince, however, have been overshadowed by Phillis
Wheatley, whose precocity attracted attention in her own time and
won for her contemporary literary recognition here and abroad.2
There are, is seems, some differences of opinion
even among scholars about where the study of black written poetry
begins. Some, like Hughes and Bontemps in The Poetry of the Negro,
begin with Lucy Terry,3 but The Negro Caravan, by Brown, Davis and
Lee omits her altogether and opens with Phillis Wheatley.4 William
H. Robinson acknowledges Terry in Early Black
_______________________
*This account began as an independent study
project undertaken at the University of Massachusetts/Amherst under
the supervision of Prof. John H. Bracey, Jr., and culminates several
years' research and study of an almost completely neglected aspect
of AfricanAmerican and colonial New England history. The greater
part of this study is republished, with permission, from Contributions
in Black Studies: A Journal of African and Afro-American Studies
9/10 (1990-1992), Amherst, Mass., The Five College Black Studies
Executive Committee, 1992. It also incorporates additions revealed
by continued research.American Poets,5 but James Johnson's The Book
of American Negro Poetry opens with Paul Laurence Dunbar.6 Kerlin's
Negro Poets and Their Poems makes no mention of Terry,7 but Randall's
The Black Poets includes her.8
_______________________
That Lucy Terry Prince is a significant if not
distinguished poetess there is no doubt. Her thirty-line doggerel,
"The Bars Fight," recounting dramatic events surrounding
the last Indian raid August 25, 1746, on Deerfield, Massachusetts,
where she was a household slave, shows a flair for story telling.
And if it lacks literary merit, it performs one of the earliest
essential services of the poetóthat of a singer of history.
It is oral history, meant to be recited aloud, and there is evidence
that Lucy herself was fond of repeating it into old age. It has
also been described as the most accurate historical account of the
engagement known.9
Like Jupiter Hammon, Lucy Terry Prince was not
a creative author but, in the tradition of the troubadour and of
Homer, a chronicler of events and happenings. Hammon has been described
as "pietistic, conservative, and obedient to his white master;"10
Lucy Terry, on the other hand, stands apart from both Hammon and
Wheatley and most contemporary poets, and may even be said to follow
in some degree the African tradition of the griot whom Alex Haley
found preserving the traditions of a people orally over generations."
In this context, if correct, Lucy Terry Prince takes on new meaning
and added importance in African-American history and American literary
history as well. Eileen Southern in The Music of Black Americans
says,
An equally significant, though less dramatic,
survival of "Africanism" is represented by the storytelling
and singing of black women in New England who, in their own way,
kept alive the African tradition. For example, Lucy Terry of Deerfield
and Senegambia of Narragansett, Rhode Island, who won wide recognition
for their gifts in this regard. Lucy, who called herself Luce Bijah,
married a free black man, Abijah Prince. After gaining her own freedom,
she made her home a gathering place for slaves and freedmen of the
community; a place where they could listen to tales and songs of
old Africa.12
I. SLAVE GIRL
On Tuesday, August 21, 1821, the following obituary
notice appeared in The Franklin Herald of Greenfield, Massachusetts:At
Sunderland, Vt., July 11th, Mrs. Lucy Prince, a woman of colour.óFrom
the church and town records where she formerly resided, we learn
that she was brought from Bristol, Rhode Island, to Deerfield, Mass.
when she was four years old, by Mr. Ebenezer Wells: that she was
97 years of ageóthat she was early devoted to God in Baptism:
that she united with the church in Deerfield in 1744óWas
married to Abijah Prince, May 17th, 1756, by Elijah Williams, Esq.
and that she had been the mother of seven children. In this remarkable
woman there was an assemblage of qualities rarely to be found among
her sex. Her volubility was exceeded by none, and in general the
fluency of her speech was not destitute of instruction and education.
She was much respected among her acquaintance, who treated her with
a degree of deference. Vt. Gaz.13This item, reprinted from The Vermont
Gazette of Bennington, Vermont, is remarkable on a number of counts.
In the first place, it seems to be the sole time Lucy Terry Prince's
name or notice of her appeared in the public press. It was an era
when obituary notices were characterized by their brevity, particularly
in the case of women, but this one is of unusual length, and, moreover,
correct in historical detail. Something of its contemporary importance
may be inferred by the stress laid on Lucy's baptism and profession
of religion; but the characterization of her ready gift of speech
and fluency, "not destitute of instruction and education,"
in a period when women were not supposed to exhibit such traits
is extraordinary. Any of this written about a woman would be noteworthy
enough, but this was a black woman and a former slave. Lucy Prince's
obituary is the climax of an unprecedented life, and her final impenetrability.
Can one discern through the mists of time and
the ambiguities of tradition something more factual about this "remarkable
woman" who commanded respect and deference from those about
her? Several attempts have been made over the years since her death,
with varying degrees of success, depending upon one's bias and credulity.
Seeking the "grain of truth" of Lucy Terry Prince involves
an exploration into the shadow of women's history and the obscurity
of African-American history; on the one hand largely recorded by
unsympathetic male domination, and on the other by an almost total
disinclination to recognize black contributions to American life.
Lucy Terry, as she was known before her marriage,
was one of several slaves owned in the village of Deerfield, Massachusetts,
in the 18th century. She was not the first black in the Puritan
outpost settlement; that distinction seems to belong to Robert Tigo,
"Negro servant" of the Reverend John Williams, who died
May 11, 1695.14 From that time to the Revolution, forty or more
blacks inhabited the village; Lucy and her husband, Abijah Prince,
however, were the only known freed slaves in 18th century Deerfield.15
Lucy, or Luce, was said to have been stolen
out of Africa when a child. That she was brought first to Rhode
Island there is general agreement, and is altogether plausible as
that colony dominated the colonial American slave trade.16 It is
not possible to identify in what ship the child came, but the event
must have taken place about 1730. A study of the slave trade in
Rhode Island reveals that in the period when Lucy arrived the rum-slave-molasses
traffic from Newport or Bristol to Africa and the West Indies was
in its early development. From participation at first of only one
or two ships annually, "Rhode Islanders entered the slave trade
in force in the 1730's."17 Between 1709 and 1807, when the
slave trade was banned, Rhode Island merchantssponsored at least
934 slaving voyages and carried an estimated 106,544 Africans to
the New World.18
Added to the difficulty of trying to identify
Rhode Island slave arrivals in the 1730's is the subsequent reluctance
of later generations to discuss the matter. Wilfred H. Munro wrote,
"Its immense profits made those who were engaged in it unwilling
to make public many facts connected with the business;óthe
higher moral tone which now prevails throughout the world has induced
their descendants to suppress all the evidence which proved the
participation of their ancestors in it."19 Of course, those
engaged in the "Triangular Trade" did not regard it as
sinful; a Bristol slaver could record in his journal, "We have
now been twenty days upon the coast [of Africa] and by the blessing
of God, shall soon have a good cargo,"20 while another, of
a leading Bristol family and vestryman of St. Michael's Episcopal
Church, cheerfully gave thanks, "that an over-ruling Providence
has been pleased to bring to this land of freedom another cargo
of benighted heathen, to enjoy the blessing of a Gospel dispensation."21
Records of those few slave cargos which have
survived sometimes mention a few children, but no babies. Lorenzo
Greene provides information that in 1720, the Massachusetts House
remitted the import duty on a "suckling child" owned by
Samuel Patishall, and that a 2-year-old slave child sold for 1 pound,
6 shillings, and 8 pence in Framingham, Massachusetts, about 1756.22
Lucy was probably born in Africa; had she been born at sea the fact
would surely not have escaped notice by myth makers and later traditions
surrounding her. Rodney B. Field, whose account of Lucy and Abijah
is among the first, says she was "said to have been of pure
African blood."23 Since the capture, care, and importation
of very small children would not have been economically feasible,
it seems almost certain Lucy was brought to America in the arms
of her mother, or as a very small child in the care of some adult
slave and too young to be manifested.
Field provides us with another important clue
to the identity of the slave girl Lucy after her arrival in America
and before she came to Deerfield. He says she was brought "from
Rhode Island to Enfield, Ct. when 5 years old (date unknown)."24
This statement is the probable explanation of why she was known
as Lucy Terry before her marriage to Abijah Prince in 1756. Among
the early settlers and founders of Enfield, Connecticut was Samuel
Terry, progenitor of a local dynasty; records of the town, its institutions,
and its history fairly bristle with Terry references.25
Samuel Terry, originally of Springfield, Massachusetts,
is said to have been brought over in 1650 by John Pynchon, perhaps
as an indentured servant.26 Here he prospered, and, while a linen
weaver by trade, he was also a farmer who accumulated extensive
land holdings and enjoyed the esteem of his neighbors.27 It is perhaps
significant to the story of Lucy that Samuel Terry died in 1730,
but although he made a will probated at Northampton, Massachusetts,
which jurisdiction then included Enfield, Connecticut, the document
contains no mention of slave property.28
Obadiah Cooley, John Burt, and Thomas Stebbins,
appraisers of Terry's estate, had some difficulty in drawing up
the accounts, so much so that Terry's grandsons, Benjamin, Ephraim,
and Jonathan petitioned for additional time, "finding the Estate
much Intangled & many Accnts & Some of them at a considerable
distance."29 Samuel Terry left his wife, Martha, onehalf of
his household goods, a black mare, two cows, and six sheep. He left
the residue of his estate to his sons who were identifying parcels
of their father's land holdings in Enfield and Somers, Connecticut
as late as 1749.30
As most blacks were not named aboard the slavers
or even after landing, until they were purchased and transported
to their owners,31 and since the surname Terry is not found among
family names of colonial Rhode Island or Deerfield, it is most probable
that Lucy came to be called Terry through an association with that
prominent family of Enfield, Connecticut, where she spent some time
before coming to Deerfield.32
We cannot know how Lucy became the property
of Deerfield resident Ebenezer Wells, but it is quite possible that
she was part of the "much Intangled" estate of Samuel
Terry. Her case may well be analogous to that of Phillis, one of
the three Negro "maids" in the estate of the Reverend
Nehemiah Bull of Westfield, Massachusetts.33
On February 4, 1741, Oliver Partridge and Elizabeth
Bull, executors of Bull's estate sold to Timothy Childs of Deerfield,
"for the sum of one Hundred pounds current Bills of credit
... a certain Negro Girl Named Phillis of about nine years of age."34
The trio in Bull's inventory the previous year were valued at 195
pounds; the increase of 35 pounds value in Phillis' case is due
to an inflationary spiral being experienced throughout colonial
New England. On July 12, 1744, Timothy Childs (1720-1781) married
Mary, daughter of Ens. Jonathan Wells, of the largest slave-holding
family in Deerfield.35
Ephraim Williams, Jr. (1715-1755), through whose
beneficence Williams College was founded, paid an even higher price,
225 pounds "old tenor," for a Negro boy named Prince,
"age about 9 years, a servant for life" on September 25,
1750.36 Earlier, Israel Williams (1709-1788), of Hatfield paid only
about 90 pounds for "a certain Negro Girl named Kate aged About
Eight or Nine years" on May 22, 1734.37 The purchase of young
girls, however, was somewhat less common.38 Sale and exchange of
New England slave property even in the most humane circumstances,
if not via public vendue, was still a reality, especially in the
settlement of estates.
II. DEERFIELD HOME
Ebenezer Wells (1691-1758) purchased a house
and barn on Deerfield's principal street in 1717, and in 1720 married
Abigail, daughter of Joseph and Sarah (Strong) Barnard. He was prominent
in town affairs, held various offices, and between 1747 and 1752
was licensed as "Innholder, taverner and common victualler
of strong liquor by retail." By 1730 he was evidently well
off, and owner of two slaves: Cesar, about whom little is known,
and Lucy.39
The first documentary evidence we have of Lucy
is a Deerfield church notice of her baptism June 15, 1735: "Lucy
Servant to Ebenezer
[illustration caption: The parlor of the Wells-Thorn
House, in which Lucy Terry lived and worked as a slave, was the
principal living space in which Abigail and Ebenezer Wells lived,
worked, slept, and for a time kept a tavern.]
[illustration caption: Lucy Terry must have
spent much of her time as a child in the kitchen of Ebenezer and
Abigail Wells' house, now open to the public as the Wells-Thorn
House at Historic Deerfield, Inc.]
Wells was Baptised upon his account."40
At the same time "Pomey Servant to Justice Jonathan Wells,
Adam & Peter Servants to Justice Thomas Wells & Cesar Servant
to Ebenezer Wells assented to the articles of ye Xtian [Christian]
faith Entered into Covenant and were baptized."41 Lucy, a child,
was not yet ready to accept the covenant. "Lusey Servant to
Ebenezer Wells was admitted to the fellowship of the Chh."
August 19, 1744,42 when she was about 20 years of age.
Slaves had a rather ambiguous place in Puritan
religious life. The master-servant [i.e. slave] relationship borrowed
from the Old Testament transformed the New England colonial slave
into something between the Jewish "servant" and the Gentile
"slave."43 Thus slaves are most frequently styled "servants"
and appear to have enjoyed certain legal and religious prerogatives,
among them at least a degree of free will in the matter of conversion.44
No fewer than five slaves were baptised that memorable June 15,
1735, during the revival known as the "Great Awakening"
which appears to have affected free and chattel citizenry alike.
In Deerfield seventy-eight persons were added to the church that
year, three of them slaves admitted to full communion.45
The slave girl Lucy seems to have made her mark
in Deerfield, especially among the young. "Lucy was a noted
character and her house a great place of resort for the young people,
attracted thither by her wit and wisdom, often shown in her rhymes
and stories."46 Deerfield historian George Sheldon calls her
"a great story teller" whose house became "a place
of resort for the young people of the ëStreet.'"47 Perhaps
as Ebenezer and Abigail Wells were childless, the black girl who
helped with the housework and did chores became more a member of
the family than was normal in traditional mixed household units.
Ebenezer Wells' accounts with Deerfield merchant
Elijah Williams (1712-1771) as recorded in Book 1 for the period
1743-1750, include a variety of goods clearly destined for the female
members of his menage: cloth, thread, buttons, silk, needles, ribbons,
and knitting needles.48 Williams even carried a small account in
Lucy's own name, between October 17, 1754 and June 7, 1755, which
recorded her purchase of 1/8 of a yard of "cambrick" (in
the 18th century a fine linen cloth used for underwear, ruffles,
handkerchiefs, etc.), a yard of "ribband," a thimble,
"sundries," and "1 cake of Chocolat."49
During the summer of 1746, when Lucy was about
22 years old, the last Indian attack on Deerfield took place a mile
or two south of the village. This followed closely the capture of
Fort Massachusetts (North Adams) on August 9, by a party of French
and Indians under Pierre Francois Rigaud de Vaudreuil. "After
the surrender, sixty Abenakis hurried ëover the Hoosac by the
Indian Path,' which is approximately the present ëMohawk Trail,'
and down the Deerfield valley, seeking more captives. Seeing on
Sunday that some unmade hay was lying in the meadow near Stillwater
of Deerfield River they waited and watched until the next morning."50
Monday, August 25, the hay-makers, refreshed
by the Sabbath, went to finish their work. They were members of
the Allen and Amsden families: Samuel Allen, 44; his children, Eunice,
13, Caleb, 9, and Samuel, 8; Oliver Amsden, 18, and Simon, 9, orphan
sons of John Amsden. These two families normally lived nearby at
a place called "The Bars" because of a barway in the common
field fence at this point. Fear of Indian attack, however, had forced
them temporarily within the fort at the village. Two soldiers seem
to have been assigned as guards for the haying party: John Saddler
of Deerfield, and Adonijah Gillett of Colchester, Connecticut. Out
on a hunting excursion, Eleazer Hawks, Allen's brother-in-law, was
with the party as it approached the waiting Indians lying in ambush
in a thicket at the foot of a nearby hill.
Of course, news of the fall of Fort Massachusetts
had not reached Deerfield and so only minimum precautions were taken.
Had not prisoners instead of scalps been their object, the Indians
might have killed the whole party in a single volley. Seeking game,
Hawks, however, stumbled upon the ambush; he was shot and the war-whoop
given as the Indians rushed toward their victims.
Although there are a few official records to
document what followed, the only contemporaneous one is the thirty-line
poem Lucy Terry composed recounting in vivid detail the bloody ordeal
suffered by her friends and neighbors.
The men urged the children to make for the fort,
while they tried to hold off the attackers as best they could. Allen
shot the foremost Indian, but he and Gillett were soon overpowered
and killed. Saddler, amid a shower of bullets, dashed through the
river to a thicket on a small island and thus escaped. Oliver Amsden
was scalped and his head severed from his body. His brother Simon
was likewise overtaken and killed after a brave defense. Caleb Allen
escaped by dodging about and hiding in a field of corn. Samuel Allen
was caught and after a sharp resistance with teeth, nails, and feet,
made prisoner of the Indians who carried him to St. Francis in Canada.
Eunice was the last to be overtaken as she fled, and finally an
Indian split her skull with his hatchet and left her for dead, bleeding
on the ground, not stopping to secure her scalp. She survived the
attack and lived for seventy-two years more, but she never fully
recovered from her ordeal.51
The high drama of the event made a deep impression
on many minds even in the frontier village where Indian depredations
had become a fact of life. There is some uncertainty whether Lucy
Terry actually wrote her poem, or if it was an oral composition.
Evidence of Lucy's literacy is scant, consisting of a cryptic reference
in a letter written to Elihu Ashley (1750-1817), by his sister Clarissa.
The eighteen-year-old, somewhat unsophisticated teenager begins
her letter with a pointless ramble, and nearly a quarter down the
page scrawls, "I suppose you will scarcely read this however
it will serve to put you in mind of old Luce for I begin at one
corner of the paper and I have got all most down to the other."52
In the spring of 1757, following his marriage
to Lucy, Abijah Prince purchased from Joseph Barnard a "Book
Secty guyde" for 10 shillings.53 This is thought to have been
The Secretary's Guide, or, Young Man's Companion, compiled by William
Bradford and published in numerous editions, a manual of grammar,
spelling, and writing forms.54 This acquisition by Abijah, who signed
all his known deeds with an "X," may have been for his
own self improvement, or, as seems more likely, that of his wife
whose literary activity is better documented.
No contemporary manuscript of Lucy's poem has
been preserved. George Sheldon seemed to believe that she produced
another version of "The Bars Fight." Two lines, "preserved
in the teeming brain of Miss Harriet Hitchcock,"55 however,
appear to be nothing more than misplaced from the original, as demonstrated
by Bernard Katz in "A Second Version of Lucy Terry's Early
Ballad."56
"The Bars Fight" Lucy Terry, 1746
____________________________________
August, 'twas the twenty-fifth,
Seventeen houndred forty-six,
The Indians did in ambush lay,
Some very valiant men to slay.
' Twas nigh unto Sam Dickinson's mill,
The Indians there five men did kill.
The names of whom I'll not leave out,
Samuel Allen like a hero foute,
And though he was so brave and bold,
His face no more shall we behold.
Eleazer Hawks was killed outright,
Before he had time to fight,
Before he did the Indians see,
Was shot and killed immediately.
Oliver Amsden he was slain,
Which caused his friends much grief pain.
Simeon Amsden they found dead
Not many rods from Oliver's head.
Adonijah Gillett, we do hear,
Did lose his life which was so dear,
John Sadler fled across the water,
And thus escaped the dreadful slaughter.
Eunice Allen see the Indians comeing
And hoped to save herself by running;
And had not her petticoats stopt her,
The awful creatures had not cotched her,
Nor tommyhawked her on the head,
And left her on the ground for dead.
Young Samuel Allen, Oh! lack-a-day!
Was taken and carried to Canada.
___________________________________
What became of "The Bars Fight" from
the time of its composition in 1746, to its publication in 1855
by Josiah G. Holland in his History of Western Massachusetts has
hitherto been a mystery. The suggestion has been made that Holland
learned of the poem from George Sheldon,57 and in fact Sheldon became
acquainted with Josiah Gilbert Holland during the 1850's, when the
Deerfield man was employed in Chicopee, Massachusetts. None of Sheldon's
notes preserved by the Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association, which
he founded in 1870, contains the poem or references to it.
Nevertheless, it is now known that George Sheldon
had access to Lucy's story and her poem before he wrote his 1893
New England Magazine article or A History of Deerfield. An account
of the Bars Fight and Lucy Terry's poem are preserved in a manuscript
"History of Deerfield," written by Pliny Arms58 (1778-1859),
a Deerfield lawyer, as an historical address probably delivered
late in 1819 at Conway, Massachusetts, to commemorate the 50th anniversary
of the ordination of that town's first minister, the Reverend John
Emerson.59 The Arms manuscript contains penciled notes and "corrections"
signed G.S. in several places. It was given to the historical organization
by Deacon Nathaniel Hitchcock (1812-1900), one of the original organizers
of the Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association and frequent early
donor of books and manuscripts. There are several minor textual
differences between the Arms manuscript, now the earliest version
known, and the publications of 1855 and 1895-1896. One is led to
speculate that probably other manuscript copies were made, either
from oral recitations or penned copies, and that the poem was preserved
in "teeming brains" and otherwise in Deerfield.
III. ABIJAH'S LUCY
Sometime about 1750, a new black presence made
itself known in Deerfield. Abijah Prince, formerly "servant"
to the Reverend Benjamin Doolittle of Northfield, Massachusetts,
must have captured the attention of Deerfield's slave population
because of his "free" status. Born about 1706, Abijah
was brought from Wallingford, Connecticut, with the household of
the Reverend Mr. Doolittle in 1717.60 The Northfield pastor perhaps
gave Abijah his freedom and some real estate rights before he died,
for in 1751 Abijah Prince was cited as a proprietor in the fourth
division of Northfield lands and owner of at least twenty acres.61
However, Northfield's town and proprietor records fail to fully
confirm this. The fourth division of Northfield common land was
voted April 9, 1753. The original record does not contain a last
name, just "Abijah," and no acreage for the lot, number
seventeen, beside the name. Further, when the lots of this division
are mapped, there is no space for this lot; owners of lots sixteen
and eighteen abut. Perhaps Abijah Prince never took up a claim,
or this was part of the allowance to Abijah Hall of Northfield in
the same division.
Abijah Prince did receive a lot in the sixth
division of common land, number forty-seven, one acre and forty
rods. This division was voted October 9, 1781. The site today is
on South Mountain Road, just east of Route 63, in Northfield, Massachusetts.61
Sheldon says Abijah held his Northfield property until 1782, although
he does not seem to have been resident there after 1752.62 On December
10, 1785 the "laborour" Abijah Prince of Guilford, Vermont,
sold this lot to Samuel Merriman for twenty shillings.63 This seems
to be the sum total of Abijah's recorded property holdings here.
Doolittle, a native of Wallingford, Connecticut,
was of a prominent family which might be expected to have had slaves.
However, Abijah as his property is not mentioned among Northfield
slaves described in an "Historical Sketch" read by Deacon
Phinehas Field at a meeting of the Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association
February 25, 1879,64 and only by name very briefly in the Northfield
town history with which George Sheldon was directly involved. Benjamin
Doolittle died suddenly on January 9, 1748/9, and evidently left
no will. In the rather detailed inventory and settlement of his
estate recorded at Northampton, Massachusetts, there is no mention
of slave property.65 It has been suggested that Abijah was granted
his freedom in recognition of military service. Although Massachusetts
excluded blacks and Indians from the militia as early as 1656,66
there is ample evidence that Deerfield slaves did see military service
in colonial New England wars.67 Sheldon even includes Abijah's name
on a 1748/9 military roll, together with Sedawdy, an Indian.68
It is no mere coincidence that the Reverend
Jonathan Ashley of Deerfield preached an evening lecture sermon
addressed to the blacks of his parish on January 23, 1749. Only
twelve days before, the Deerfield clergyman had preached the funeral
sermon for his colleague and fellow Yale alumnus the Reverend Benjamin
Doolittle;69 the unique situation enjoyed by Abijah cannot have
escaped notice by blacks throughout the neighborhood, which in 1755
numbered 74 in Hampshire County, 56 males and 18 females.70
Taking as his text, First Corinthians 7:22,
"For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the
Lord's freeman: likewise also he that is called, being free, is
the servant," the pastor opened with a classic statement of
spiritual equality:
God has no respect of persons in the affair
of our salvation; whosoever will is invited to come and take of
the waters of life freely. There are none of the human race too
low and despicable for God to bestow salvation upon. Yea, it is
the mean and base things of this world which God is pleased to choose
to eternal life, whilst the rich are sent empty away, and the great
and honorable are left to perish in their sin.71
He then proceeded in classic Puritan fashion
to instruct his hearers in their appropriate understanding and interpretation
of God's will:
1st, I will show that Christianity allows
of the relation of master and servants.
2ndly, I will show that such as are by divine
providence placed in the state of servant are not excluded from
salvation but may become the Lord's freemen.
3rdly, I will show what a privilege and advantage
it is to be a freeman in the Lord.
4thly, I will give some directions to such
as want to become the Lord's freemen.
5thly, I will show what motives there are
for such to be the Lord's freemen.
The pastor spoke of believing servants and unbelieving
masters, about Paul, Philemon, Onessimus, etc. "What a temptation
of the Devil it is therefore to lead servants into sin, and provoke
God; to insinuate into them they ought not to abide in ye place
of servantóand so either forsake their master, or are uneasy,
unfaithful, slothful servants, to the damage of masters & the
dishonor of religion, the reproach of Christianity."72
The captive audience was cautioned finally,
"You must be contented with your state and condition in the
world, and not murmur and complain of what God orders for you. You
must be faithful in the place God puts you and not be eye servantsó[it
is] in vain to think to be Christ's freemen and be slothful servants."73
The minister probably went to his warm bed that
night well satisfied with his performance, while his hearers found
their way to cold garret or loft still puzzled. Why, they must have
wondered, could Abijah come and go as he pleased, decide for himself
what work he would do, and be able to play court to one of their
number, the loquacious Lucy? What was it that allowed Abijah to
do what they could not, and how could they become like him?
Abijah persevered and prevailed: "Abijah
Prince and Lucy Terry Servant to Ens. Ebenr Wells were married May
ye 17, 1756 by Elijah Williams, Justo Pace."74 Lucy, it would
thus appear, was still a slave upon her marriage. This was a situation
George Sheldon suggests might have been to Ebenezer Wells' liking,
who might have hoped for profit since the offspring of such a marriage
followed the condition of the mother.75 However, in this instance
the children of Abijah and Lucy were free, nor is there further
reference to Lucy as "servant" or slave.
That the union was performed by a justice rather
than the pastor does not infer any censure on the part of the church.
Marriage was viewed as a civil contract, the proper function of
magistrate and not of the minister in colonial New England.76 Although
the Reverend Jonathan Ashley solemnized a good many, civil marriages
appear increasingly during the 1750's; Deerfield church records
show the pastor performed only one marriage in 1756.77
Perhaps Ebenezer Wells granted Lucy manumission
in recognition of a quarter century of faithful if involuntary servitude;
or maybe Abijah was her champion and the means of her emancipation.
The couple set up housekeeping a little to the east of the village,
on land owned by Ebenezer Wells at the eastern end of his property,
part of lot No. 26, purchased 39 years before.78 If Abijah was not
possessed of land of his own, he gave to it his name: the nearby
brook was long known as "Bijah's brook;"79 also nearby
was "Abijah's hill" where Laurel Hill Cemetery was later
laid out.80
Abijah Prince was industrious and carried accounts
with several individuals and merchants of Deerfield as revealed
in the account book collections of the Pocumtuck Valley Memorial
Association Library; perhaps his wide-ranging activity involved
securing his wife's freedom. Dealings with Elijah Williams between
March and June 1756 included his purchase of mugs of cider, a knife,
cloth, and a "drum rim," for which he paid in salmon.
Following his marriage, Abijah paid Williams for "sundries,"
a cake of soap, cloth, cheese, rice, rum, and brandy by working
clearing land, carting hay, mowing, and ferrying.81 Abijah was employed
by Deerfield's minister, Jonathan Ashley, cutting brush and wood,
mowing, and sugaring between February 1756 and November 1759,82
and for Salah Barnard he made lime mortar and cut tobacco in return
for "an old under Bed & 2 blankets," foodstuffs, and
a woolen shirt between January 1765 and June 1767.83
Accounts with Joseph Barnard, between July 1772
and August 1775, show Abijah buying seed corn, meal, rum, and "old
nails," for which he paid in reaping, winnowing, "hechiling
flax" and "Sifting & mixing Lyme morter."84 Among
the most interesting accounts are those with Doctor Thomas Williams
between August 1757 and June 1775. For remedies of an herbal natureócamphor,
cathartic, lavenderóblood-letting and emolument, Abijah settled
by making five barrels of cider, ferrying, lime mortar, and "by
yr wife's work" valued at 8 pence on November 26, 1765, and
probably also her "spinning 5 Rum [Runs] Tow Yarn" for
2 shillings and 6 pence on July 9, 1775.85 That Abijah was fully
aware of political conditions of the world in which he lived is
clearly indicated by the charge of Dr. Williams on October 31, 1765,
"Recording 5 Births," 10 pence, entered on the books of
the town the day before the Stamp Act went into effect when a tax
on such official records was imposed.86
Abijah was about fifty years of age when he
married a woman some twenty years his junior. This disparity may
be explained at least in part by the disproportion between the sexes
of New England's slave population. Of 2,674 Negro slaves of sixteen
years upwards in Massachusetts in 1755, the year before the marriage,
1,500 were males and only 855 were females.87 Negro males of marriageable
age had almost no prospect of marrying within their age group.
The union proved fruitful, for six children
were born to Abijah and Lucy between 1757 and 1769. If Abijah was
somewhat slow in his civil responsibility recording births of his
children, he and Lucy attended to their spiritual obligation more
punctually, and each of their children was baptised shortly after
birth by Parson Jonathan Ashley: Caesar, born January 14, 1757 was
baptised on February 13, 1757; Duroxa, born June 1, 1758 was baptised
on July 30, 1758; Drusilla, born August 7, 1760 was baptised on
September 7, 1760; Festus, born December 12, 1763 was baptised on
January 29, 1764; Tatnai, a son, born September 2, 1765 was baptised
on September 22, 1765; and Abijah, born June 12, 1769 was baptised
on August 6, 1769.88
The names chosen reflect interest and allegiance
to religion and the Bible in which Lucy was said to be especially
steadfast, her "knowledge of the holy scriptures was uncommonly
great," and, "having a tenacious memory," she was
able to recite large portions learned by heart over a fifty-year
period.89 Caesar has classical Roman origins, but figures in Biblical
literature; Drusilla was the name of the wife of Felix Antonius,
a freed slave, who as procurator of Judaea was responsible for the
persecution of the apostle Paul. Festus Porcius was procurator of
Judaea following Felix, and Tatnui the name of a satrap or governor
of the province west of the Euphrates in the time of Darious Hystaspis.
Abijah was probably given to honor the child's father, but is also
name of the son and successor of Rehoboam and is to be found elsewhere
in the Old Testament.90 Duroxa has not yet been identified as to
origin. Although obituaries state that Lucy was the mother of seven
children, no other offspring are on record.
Prince was commonly known as "Bijah,"
and his wife went by the familiar sobriquet "Luce Bijah,"
indicative of their local notoriety. Theirs must have been a lively
household and gathering place. A new generation of young people
was attracted to Lucy's fireside where they were entertained with
recitations, music and poetry on the order of an adult literary
circle.91
One or both of Lucy's daughters, Duroxa and
Drusilla, may have inherited their mother's poetic talent. Drusilla,
who was also "a great singer,"92 became disabled and a
town charge in 1838 at Sunderland, Vermont. In 1850 the federal
census listed her, age 88, blind and a pauper who could not read
or write, living with a family in Arlington, Vermont.93 She died
November 21, Duroxa's talent may have been clouded by insanity;94
she died "a few years previous to her mother."95
Festus, the second son, "was inclined to
festivity.96 He was a natural musician and could play upon any instrument,
reminiscent perhaps of another parental example (his father purchased
a "drum rim" of Elijah Williams in 1756). Abijah is said
to have swapped a piece of land for an old horse, saddle and bridle,
and a fiddle, "with which goods he endowed his son."97
Both Caesar and Festus served in the American
Revolution. Caesar marched with Connecticut River Valley troops
twice, under Captains Caleb and Moses Montague, in the summer of
1777, and again in the fall of 1779 on northern expeditions of the
Second Hampshire Regiment to reinforce the Continental Army. His
total service amounted to two months and twentyfive days.98 Festus,
age sixteen, stature five feet three inches, enlisted in the Continental
Army from Stockbridge, Massachusetts, in the summer of 1779, and
appears on other Stockbridge rolls in 1780 and 1781. He served at
least five months at West Point, New York, and was reported with
an artillery regiment and in the horse guard.99
IV. VERMONT PIONEERS
Samuel Field (1678-1762) of Deerfield was a
prominent citizen and church deacon as well as a substantial landowner
there and in Northfield, Massachusetts, where he received a grant
of 200 acres in 1736, probably in recognition of military service
to the colony.100 He was one of the original Massachusetts grantees
of Guilford, Vermont, in 1736, and a proprietor under New Hampshire's
Benning Wentworth grant of 1754. The deacon is supposed to have
promised Abijah a 100-acre lot in his newly-opened territory.101
Following Samuel Field's death, his son David Field who was also
a participant in the development of Guilford, conveyed the land
to Abijah, lot no. 187, in 1781, although Prince lived there perhaps
as early as 1765.102 Field, father and son, were undoubtedly acquainted
with Ebenezer Wells; further, David's wife, Thankful, was the widow
of Oliver Doolittle, eldest son of the Reverend Benjamin Doolittle,
Abijah's old master.103
The record is unclear whether Abijah and Lucy
established a permanent home near "Packer Corner" in Guilford,
or if they soon returned to Deerfield after a few years of frontier
life. In any event, the Prince family was resident on their Vermont
land by 1785 when they became embroiled in a neighborhood squabble
of such proportion that it came to the attention of none other than
the Governor and Council of the State of Vermont.104
There was much trouble between "Bijah"
and the Noyes families whose lands adjoined. After having their
fences torn down and hay ricks burned, as well as being subjected
to a variety of annoyances, Lucy decided to act. This woman, "a
prodigy in conversation" whose "volubility was exceeded
by none," and whose fluency of speech "captivated all
around her,"105 addressed a petition to the highest authorities
for redress of grievances.
At a meeting held at Norwich on Tuesday, June
7, 1785, attended by Governor Thomas Chittenden, Lieutenant Governor
Paul Spooner, and Councilors Moses Robinson, Peter Olcott, Benjamin
Emmonds, Thomas Murdock, John Throop, and Ira Allen, the following
piece of business was considered:
On the Representation of Lucy Prince, wife of
Abijah Prince, and others shewing that, the said Abijah, Lucy and
Family, are greatly oppressed & injured by John and Ormas Noyce,
in the possession and enjoyment of a certain farm or Piece of Land,
on which the said Abijah and Lucy now Lives, the Council having
Taken the same into consideration and made due enquiry, are of Opinion
that the said Abijah and Lucy are much injured, and that unless
the Town take some due Methods to protect said Abijah, Lucy &
family in the enjoyment of their possession, they must soon unavoidably
fall upon the Charity of the Town. Therefore Resolved that His Excellency
be Requested to write to the Selectmen of the Town of Guilford Recommending
to them to Take some effectual Measures to protect the said Abijah,
Lucy & family, in the Possession of said Lands until the said
dispute can be equally & equitably settled.106
In crossing swords with John Noyes, Lucy took
on an impressive adversary. "Squire" Noyes, as he was
sometimes called, hailed from Groton, Connecticut,107 and his Vermont
property on lot 190 was one of the most pretentious of the ancient
Guilford homesteads.108 Holding important town positions of trust,
Noyes was Guilford's representative to the Vermont legislature (1799-1804
and 1809-1811) and a member of the Vermont electoral college in
the presidential election of 1800.109 He and his sizable family
(numbering 13 in 1790) clearly outnumbered and out-ranked "Bijah"
and Lucy, whose household was not even enumerated in the first federal
census on 1790.110
Although it is difficult to view this disturbance
in other than racial terms, it may well have had political overtones,
property line controversies, and local jealousies at its core. During
the period Guilford was torn by factional disputes over loyalties
to New York State and the recently established Republic of Vermont.
"Though no formal pitched battle was ever fought, the town
has probably been the scene of more internal strife and violence
than any other in the State."111 John Noyes was an active partisan
of Vermont interests. It is unclear where "Bijah" stood
in the controversy, but as two of his children-Festus and Abijah,
Jr.--lived in New York State, it may be that the Princes were inclined
toward the "Yorker" faction, or infuriated their neighbors
by trying to maintain neutrality during the period in which their
town existed in a virtual state of anarchy.
"Bijah" apparently shared an inordinate
hunger for land with other frontiersmen, and although there is reason
to believe he was not always a good manager of it, he continually
sought opportunities. Rodney B. Field writing to George Sheldon,
February 15, 1879 reveals how his proprietorship may not have been
without difficulties: "Abijah was cheated out of land by Samuel
Beldon and Elijah Walsworth by trading off property that they had
not title to."112 In the case of Northfield holdings, we know
that the final sale in 1785 involved only one acre and forty rods
for the sum of twenty shillings.113 When "Bijah" conveyed
100 acres in Guilford to Augustus Belding on June 4, 1788, he received
fifteen pounds for the same lot no. 187, his Guilford homestead
grant from David Field seven years before.114 "Bijah"
and Lucy probably remained living on the Guilford property, for
here Abijah died and was buried. It was said creditors dared not
bring a writ of ejection against Lucy because her husband was buried
on the property which became known as "Abijah's lot."115
Even before he left Deerfield, Ebenezer Wells'
paternity, and David Field's liberality, Abijah sought security
for himself and his young family as a proprietor of Sunderland,
Vermont. His name is among the original sixtyfour grantees of the
wilderness tract in Bennington County chartered July 29, 1761,116
and he was the only one of the grantees to actually settle there.117
Abijah drew an equal share with the others in all six divisions
of Sunderland common lands where his holdings amounted to upwards
of 300 acres.
Abijah and Lucy's eldest son, Ceasar, took up
one tract. Caesar was among the signers of the covenant at the settlement
of the Reverend Henry Williams at Guilford, January 1, 1779,118
and as a military veteran he was, for a few years before his death
in 1836, a pensioner receiving $32 per year from the government.119
Festus, the second son, built a log house upon
one of his father's lots, but removed to New York about 1815, and
to Danby, Vermont in 1817 where he died in February 1819.120 He
married a white woman; "the day after his burial his family
were brought to Sunderland on an order of removal."121 The
widow, Lucy, subsequently married a black man named William McGowan
on September 26, 1822.122 McGowan died about 1827; Festus' eldest
daughter married a Salem, New York, grocery merchant of some means,
and the family numbering seven or eight emigrated there.123
Festus' deed of sale September 26, 1817 to Remembrance
Sheldon of Williamstown, Massachusetts, scion of a Deerfield family,
of his share of the first division of Sunderland land, lot no. 20
originally drawn by Abijah Prince, is the only recorded transaction
of Abijah's holdings.124 There is indication in town records of
other transfersólots set off to E. Graves about 1811, and
Abijah's rights to other land "struck off" to John Searl.125
It was said at the time of Lucy's death, "Her husband was proprietor
of some rights of land in this state; but through inattention they
were lost, which subjected her to penury."126
V. CHAMPION OF RIGHT
During the period Lucy and Abijah were resident
in Vermont, tradition links her to one of western New England's
oldest collegiate institutions. The earliest published account (1888)
is by Rodney B. Field:
Desiring a liberal education for one of her
sons, probably Festus, she [Lucy] applied at Williams College. He
was rejected on account of his race; the indignant mother argued
the case in a "3-hour speech" before the trustees, quoting
abundantly text after text from the scriptures in support of her
claims for his reception.127
Investigation of original College trustee records
at Williamstown, Massachusetts however, fails to confirm the event.128
Candidates for admission to Williams College in 1793 were required
to be able to read accurately Virgil's Aeneid and Tully's Orations
in Latin and the Evangelists in Greek, or be familiar with French
and demonstrate acquaintance with the rules of arithmetic.129 These
are requirements no district school education in Guilford could
match. Perhaps Lucy sought admission of her son to the Free School
in Williamstown, opened in the fall of 1791, which became "unexpectedly
popular especially in its higher departments" and was housed
in "a commodious building and furnished with a competent head,"
Ebenezer Fitch.130 Two branches of instruction were established:
and English free school recruited from the higher classes in the
town schools; and a grammar school or academy.131 When the school
was incorporated as a college by act of the Legislature in 1793,
the free English department was dropped, but the grammar school,
for which tuition was charged, continued for a few years as a kind
of preparatory institution.132
The archives of Williams College and papers
of Ebenezer Fitch, preceptor of the Free School and first president
of the College, fail to substantiate the popular myth concerning
Lucy's "earnest and eloquent" harangue, but Fields undocumented
assertion has been repeated in all accounts of Lucy as evidence
of the remarkable fluency of her speech. It does not figure in older
Williams College histories, but it is included in Leverett W. Spring's
later A History of Williams College (Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company,
1917), pp. 138-139, based on George Sheldon's writings. There is
probably truth behind the anecdote, but undated and unsubstantiated,
it must now be viewed as more parable than gospel.
Some added credence, however, must now be given
to the story in light of what Pliny Arms wrote in 1819 of the event:
"Clark Williams of Dalton, Massachusetts, an old acquaintance
of Lucy, befriended her. The trustees were not a little discomforted
and perplexed, and the man made black by the hand of God in this
land of pretended equality was refused."133 William Williams
of Dalton, Massachusetts, was known as "Clark" or "Clerk"
Williams from his services to town and church in his native Hatfield,
Massachusetts, and later Dalton, where he removed at the time of
the American Revolution. "He was the first named of the original
board of trustees of the school which became ultimately Williams
College." "He was one of the original founders of Williams
College, and was efficient in the organization of the free school
and the college."134
Had a collegiate education been her aim for
Festus, Lucy may have applied to the wrong school. Williams awarded
its first diploma to an AfroAmerican in 1889.135 Middlebury College
in her adopted state of Vermont, claims the honor of America's first
black college graduate sixty-six years earlier, Alexander Lucius
Twilight in 1823.136 Moreoever, Middlebury's honorary A. M. degree
conferred on the Reverend Lemuel Haynes in 1804 is the first American
collegiate recognition of any African-American.137 Both Amherst
and Bowdoin graduated African-Americans in 1826; Oberlin in 1844;
and Harvard in 1870, although three other blacks had taken degrees
in 1869 from Harvard's graduate schools of law, medicine, and dentistry.138
In Sunderland, Vermont, Abijah and Lucy established
themselves south of the Batten Kill River, not far from the home
of Colonel Ethan Allen, who had located on the opposite side of
the creek.139 Allen, however, seems to have been too occupied with
political manipulations and other stratagems to disturb the domestic
tranquility of his black neighbors.140 Such was not the case with
their nearer abutter, Colonel Eli Bronson, whose lands adjoined
Abijah's. Bronson set up a claim to part of "Bijah's"
property, and "by repeated law suits obtained about one-half
of the home lot, and had not the town interposed they would have
lost the whole."141
This predicament gives rise to the second perplexity
concerning Lucy: the tradition that she argued her own case against
Bronson's claim before the United States Supreme Court.142 The situation
becomes more mystifying when one considers that Samuel Chase of
Maryland (1741-1811) actually was an associate justice of the United
States Supreme Court, appointed by George Washington in 1796.143
Given the fact that the Supreme Court never held a session in Vermont,
and the report that Chase complimented Lucy after her appearance,
saying she "made a better argument than he had ever heard from
a lawyer in Vermont,"144 it follows that if Lucy argued her
case in a court presided over by Chase, it would have to have been
the U. S. Circuit Court during May 1796, at Bennington, as that
was the only Vermont session in which Chase participated.145
The Vermont Gazette, of Bennington, announced
in its issue of May 11, 1796: "Sunday last arrived in town
the hon. Judge Chace and his lady, his honor will open the session
of the Circuit Chourt of the United States in this town tomorrow."
Some unknown bard greeted the jurist:
Sometimes the mind of man conceives aright,
Of things predestined for his future view, And sometimes for a beauty
rears a fright, Mere fancy's object, quite unlike the true. A case
in pointóhis honor justice Ch-c, His coach unharnest and
his gout polite, His Lady forward, walked to view the place From
Dewey's inn to court-house' gentle height. So an important stately
ship of war, Exploring foreign shores, with wise design Sends on
the beauteous tender, to prepare A passage for her consort of the
line. But to return, arrived at greatest height, He sought the seat
of justice, stately, grand, But no such object offering to his sight,
Pray sir, says he, where does the court house stand? Where! says
the man he askedówhy here before usó What said his
honor in a house?óIt is! Yes Sir! Why did you think 'twas
out of doors? Aye! says the judge, and laugh'd beneath the trees.146Subsequent
issues of the paper shed no light on the court's business. As with
the tradition connecting Lucy Terry Prince to Williams College,
there is probably some truth behind this anecdote, although it defies
documentation despite its plausibility. George Sheldon, it would
seem, overstepped the bounds of the historian in describing the
event and its outcome in Lucy's favor; even Rodney B. Field was
not so incautious.147
VI. THE FINAL YEARS
Abijah and Lucy may have been discouraged by
their Sunderland, Vermont ordeal where "for many years they
were more or less aided by the town,"148 and returned to Guilford
where Abijah spent his final years. His death January 19, 1794,
age eighty-eight, was recorded by the church there.149 Abijah's
grave located a few rods westerly from the highway was marked by
a lettered slate headstone. Upon division of the property the site
"fell into the hands of Capt. Isaac Noyes" who "fixed
up the grave"150 which was respected by successive owners until
about 1890. A later owner, Charles Jacob, probably ignorant of its
significance, plowed over the burial spot, although the location
continued to be known as the "Bijah lot," was generally
recognized by townsfolk and was pointed out to the younger generations
as the final resting place of the black Guilford pioneer.151
Abijah's final "appearance" in Guilford
was reported not long after his death at a spot on the road leading
northerly from the Noyes homestead toward the center of town. A
young woman of the Noyes family passing along "Cold Spring
Pitch," a steep grade leading out of a little hollow and natural
spring, just at nightfall was terrified by a "fearsome apparition."
The young woman clung to the saddle as her horse bolted in a mad
run up the pitch, down the road past "Bijah's" grave,
and on to the Noyes homestead. The phantom was declared to be "Bijah's"
ghost, but whether or not it was so, or some great owl or startled
deer, distorted by a troubled conscience, is not known.152
Of Lucy's final years we have a few fleeting
glimpses. Rodney B. Field writes, "After Abijah's death [she]
lived a few years in a log house of my grandfather." [Elihu
Field (1753-1814) son of "Bijah's" Guilford patron David
Field, who married Hepzibah Dickinson]. Lucy was evidently a talented
mimic, for Field continues, "Mother [Pamelia Burt Field (1784-1872)]
once when I was a boy acted out Lucy which grandmother said was
perfect and it caused a great laugh as there were visitors that
knew Lucy well, and I can see in my mind her various positions."153
Perhaps her son Tatnai was her solace in old
age. Phinehas Field indicates that Tatnai was "held" by
Captain Samuel Hunt of Northfield, which Sheldon guardedly accepts.154
However, Tatnai of Northfield and Lucy's son were perhaps two distinct
individuals. Rodney B. Field recalled, "I now think Tatnai
used to come to our place when I was a boy. If so he was a tall
good looking man and quite a talker."155
Lucy remained in Guilford until about 1808,
when she returned to Sunderland, Vermont,156 probably making her
final home with her eldest son, Caesar, a farmer reported in the
federal census schedules for Sunderland in 1820 and 1830. "Abijah's
widow had a strong memory; few indeed could repeat more scripture.
At an advanced age she would ride horseback to Bennington, a distance
of 18 miles," Giles B. Bacon recalled.157 As long as she lived
she made an annual pilgrimage over the Green Mountains "to
see the old folks"158 at Guilford and visit her husband's grave.159
Although Lucy is known to have shown her mettle
in the matter of her rights, she appears to have always recognized
the inherent inequality of her time. "When Lucy Prince, a respected
African-born woman visited a white family in rural Deerfield, Massachusetts,
in her old age, she is said to have refused a place at the table,
saying, ëNo, Missy, no, I know my place.'"160
Lucy was blind for several years previous to
her death. Giles B. Bacon makes the telling if inconclusive comment,
"She gave her age at the time of the Deerfield Masacre which
she often related [which] if correct in her statement [she] would
have been 112 years [old]."161 It now seems more probable that
the old woman was retelling her story of the "Bars Fight"
which her hearers confused with the 1704 Deerfield Massacre, an
error still encountered from those seeking information about Lucy's
poem and the event it describes.
Lucy Terry Prince died at Sunderland, Vermont,
on July 11, 1821, at ninety-seven years of age.162 The Vermont Gazette
of Bennington published a long obituary, reprinted in part by The
Franklin Herald of Greensfield, Massachusetts, and perhaps other
newspapers. "Suitable respect was shown at her interment, and
evidence exhibited that her memory was precious," the newspapers
reported. However, there is no notice of Lucy's death or burial
in the Public Records/Vital Records files of the State of Vermont
at Montpelier, the Vermont D.A.R. Book of Records of Sunderland
cemeteries at the Vermont Historical Society, or Susan Fisher's
Vital Statistics of Sunderland, Vermont; Also Record of Gravestones,
Taken From All Available Sources, compiled by Susan Fisher and J.
M. McCabe, a typescript at the Vermont Historical Society. In this
last there is indication that town records 18201870 may be missing.
Perhaps in Lucy's final triumph over a life
of hard work, bitter controversy, and disappointment she bequeathed
a double legacy: her courageous strength of character clearly emerging
from the almost invisible heritage of black American history, and
the opportunity at her funeral for an important statement on slavery
by the Reverend Lemuel Haynes, styled "the most significant
Black man in America prior to the emergence of Frederick Douglas."163
The Bennington newspaper reported, "A discourse adapted to
the occasion was delivered by the Rev. Mr. Haynes, of Manchester,"
and appended to Lucy's obituary a verse of twenty-four lines, which
if not attributable to Haynes, certainly must have had his approbation:
And shall proud tyrants boast with brazen face,
Of birth; of genius, over Africa's race:
Go to the tomb where lies their matron's dust,
And read the marble, faithful to its trust.
Let not within Columbia's happy bower,
Infested lungs pollute the sacred tower:
Drives them away, as did our blessed Lord:*
And Mallary, with his eloquence severe
Dispels the fog and purifies the air.
Shall drear Missouri's melancholy cell,
Caress the demon, emigrant of hell?
Shall there fell Slav'ry find a dark retreat?
And vagrant despots stalk about the street?
Then let our union be a fulsome name:
Our tongues shall hiss them from our courts of fame.
How long must Ethaopia's murder'd race
Be doom'd by men to bondage & disgrace?
And hear such taunting insolence from those
"We have a fairer skin and sharper nose?"
Their sable mother took her rapt'rous flight,
High orb'd amidst the realms of endless light:
The haughty boaster sinks beneath her feet,
Where vaunting tyrants & opressors meet.
_________
*John 2.15.164
Mentioned by name in the poem are Rollin Mallary
and John Seargent [sic.]. Rollin Carolas Mallary (1784-1831), of
Poultney, Vermont's representative to Congress, "won some distinction
as an opponent to the admission of Missouri with slavery."165
Mallary's speech in Congress on the Missouri question, including
whether "any negro or mulatto has political rights in any state,"
was published in the Vermont Gazette of Bennington, January 23,
1821. John Sergeant (1779-1852), represented Pennsylvania in Washington.166
He too opposed the Missouri Compromise, and it was said, "his
greatest strength was as a forensic legalist."167 His February
1820 speech in Congress on the Compromise was published.
The Reverend Lemuel Haynes (1753-1833) became
minister at Manchester, Vermont, in the summer of 1818 following
a thirty-year pastorate at Rutland, and before his settlement at
Granville, New York, in February 1822.168 A possible connection
with Lucy Terry Prince has previously been sought without success
from the Rutland, Vermont, Historical Society;169 her Vermont Gazette
obituary has not been noted before.
One would certainly wish to know what were the
"evidences that her memory was precious," and how "suitable
respect" to her was demonstrated at the funeral. Most especially,
what did Reverend Lemuel Haynes have to say that was "adapted"
to so unique an occasion? The verses printed with Lucy's obituary,
perhaps, offer a clue. It is particularly tantalizing in view of
Ruth Bogin's assertion that "one of the striking facts about
his proditious output, the fruit of half a century of preaching,
is its almost total silence about slavery."170 On the other
hand, funeral discourses seem to have been Haynes' specialty: "Few
of Christ's ministers have been called more frequently on funeral
occasions to administer instruction and consolation."171
Lucy Terry Prince, America's first black poetess,
champion for justice, and loyal wife and mother, has partially emerged
from obscurity. Although we now know more about her and Abijah,
her husband, than most contemporary African-Americans, Lucy still
remains somewhat in the shadows and will doubtless always be the
subject of myth and folklore at the mercy of the romancer and the
uninformed. Perhaps there is nothing more to be discovered except
a few legal papers, a deed or two, or a newspaper item which has
escaped notice. Lucy's story which has come down to the historian
in documents and facts is like the life she led, an unadorned and
unembellished saga in which there was no time for personal egotism
or conceit. She was, nevertheless, a remarkable individual, "an
assemblage of qualities rarely to be found among her sex,"
and this is the final and ultimate riddle and the Lucy Terry Prince
we perhaps can never fully know.
EPILOGUE & BIBLIOGRAPHIC NOTE
The Rodney B. Field correspondence with George
Sheldon and the significant Giles B. Bacon 1877 letter to Field,
forwarded to Sheldon, are the principal new sources of this study.
George Sheldon drew upon them but missed some of their implications
in his interpretation of Lucy Terry Prince. They are part of the
manuscript collections of the Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association
in Deerfield, Massachusetts, and do not appear to have been consulted
by anyone since Sheldon until now.
Bacon, whom Field described as "a full
blooded Jackson Democrat," represented Sunderland in the Vermont
legislature twelve terms, and about 1858 contributed data on his
town, including a bit about the Abijah Prince family, published
in Abby Maria Hemenway's The Vermont Historical Gazetteer, (Burlington,
Vt., 1867-1891), vol. I pp. 238-240. This material has been repeated
in later works, notably Hamilton Child's Gazetteer and Business
Directory of Bennington County for 1880-81Ö(Syracuse, N. Y.,
1880.)
Rodney B. Field collaborated with John Wolcott
Phelps in the earliest history of Guilford, Vermont, published in
1888, incorporated in Hemeway, vol. V pt.3, published in 1891. Somewhat
more authoritative than Bacon, Field's account has also found its
way into other works, notably George Sheldon's.
Field is an almost contemporary, but not a first-hand
source. "I have no recollection of ever having seen Lucy,"
he wrote Sheldon, but he repeated information from his family and
others: "I was at Bellows Falls in June and saw Col. Russell
Hyde he told me he remembered Lucy Prince very well." In most
respects Field seems dependable, but there are enough inconsistencies
to throw doubt on his credibility in the matter of Williams College
and the United States Supreme Court of which he seems to be originator.
Field, the tenacious genealogist of the Field
family (his important manuscript, Sheldon described as "a volume
no library in the land can match," and correspondence were
given to Sheldon's Deerfield library in 1883), wrote Sheldon soon
after the 1875 publication of A History of the Town of NorthfieldÖwhich
Sheldon co-authored. Field's letters are largely genealogical in
nature, inquiries and notices of individuals, but he does seem to
have introduced Sheldon to Abijah Prince. Field also wrote to Bacon
(letter, February 20, 1877 in the Russell Vermontiana Collection
of the Martha Canfield Memorial Free Library, Arlington, Vermont),
and Bacon's important reply of February 27, 1877, was sent to Sheldon,
"I also enclose a letter from Giles B. Bacon, Esq., of Sunderland,
Vt., in relation to Abijah Prince family so you can make his family
record in full -- You can keep the letter among your archives if
you like and should I ever want any of the informaton will know
where to find it."
George Sheldon is the principal perpetrator
of Lucy Terry Prince's story and legend. His 1893 article, "Negro
Slavery in Old Deerfield," appeared in New England Magazine,
new series vol. VIII no. 1 (March 1893), pp. [49]-60, and was widely
circulated via the periodical and off-prints. It is an ambitious
article, substantially accurate, and a pioneer contribution to African-American
historical studies. Sheldon, however, made no attempt to verify
what Rodney B. Field wrote him, and even is guilty of embellishment.
Sheldon kept a record of some 100 copies of
the off-print sent to historical societies, libraries, and individuals
including Francis Parkman. Copies were also sent to the Atlanta
Constitution, Augusta Chronicle, Charleston News & Courier,
New Orleans Times-Picayune, New Orleans Democrat, Memphis Commercial
Appeal, Richmond Dispatch, Jackson Clarion, and Louisville Journal.
Reviews from these sources might make interesting reading.
The more scholarly discovery revealed in this
study is Lucy's Vermont Gazette obituary and her hitherto unknown
connection with the Reverend Lemuel Haynes. A literary analysis
of the verses included, as with "The Bars Fight" itself,
might reveal something of significance in the thinking of the individuals
as author.
What remains largely undone is a comprehensive
search of newspapers for possible references to Lucy, and more especially
the publication of her poem. It now seems reasonable to suppose
that in Vermont where "her memory was precious," the ditty
she recited in old age was perhaps communicated to a newspaper as
"suitable respect" to her memory. However, issues of Bennington's
Vermont Gazette, for the period 1819-1825, have been scanned without
result.
top of page
|